1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1976 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Challenger | Fronte |
Year Released | 1969 | 1976 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 30 L |