1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1977 Volvo 66 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Challenger | 66 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1550 mm |