1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1978 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1978 Toyota Tercel is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 625 kg more than 1978 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1978 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Tercel |
Year Released | 1969 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |