1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1979 Mazda 616
To start off, 1979 Mazda 616 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 656 kg more than 1979 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1979 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 616 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1979 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |