1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 1980 TVR 3000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 450 kg more than 1980 TVR 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Dodge | TVR |
Model | Challenger | 3000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 58 L |