1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 1981 Mazda 929 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 475 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Challenger | 929 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6974 cc | 1969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |
