1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 1982 Mazda 323 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 645 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 323 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2370 mm |