1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1982 Zastava 750

To start off, 1982 Zastava 750 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 960 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 1982 Zastava 750
Make Dodge Zastava
Model Challenger 750
Year Released 1969 1982
Engine Size 7206 cc 848 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 33 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 545 Nm 55 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 640 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3300 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1390 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2010 mm