1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2430 mm |