1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1986 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1986 Opel Kadett is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1986 Opel Kadett. (81 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Kadett.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Kadett. (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1986 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Challenger | Kadett |
Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1390 mm |