1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1988 Fiat Tipo
To start off, 1988 Fiat Tipo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1988 Fiat Tipo. (83 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1988 Fiat Tipo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 445 kg more than 1988 Fiat Tipo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Fiat Tipo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Fiat Tipo. (130 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Fiat Tipo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1988 Fiat Tipo | |
| Make | Dodge | Fiat |
| Model | Challenger | Tipo |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5208 cc | 1581 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 352 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99.3 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
