1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 67 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Challenger | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5562 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 57 L |
