1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
| Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Challenger | M25 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5562 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 421 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
