1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1989 Mazda 323

To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (126 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 1989 Mazda 323
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Challenger 323
Year Released 1969 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5208 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 156 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 352 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.3 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 78.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2510 mm