1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1989 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 270 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1989 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Dodge | Plymouth |
Model | Challenger | Sundance |
Year Released | 1969 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |