1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1992 Volvo 480
To start off, 1992 Volvo 480 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1992 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Challenger | 480 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |