1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1993 Ford Focus
To start off, 1993 Ford Focus is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Focus (227 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Focus. (305 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1993 Ford Focus | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Focus |
Year Released | 1969 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1230 mm |