1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1994 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1994 Mercury Cougar is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 125 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1994 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Challenger | Cougar |
Year Released | 1969 | 1994 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |