1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 1994 Rover 200 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 327 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Challenger | 200 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |