1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 396 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Challenger | Bravo |
Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1893 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |