1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1995 Rover 214
To start off, 1995 Rover 214 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1995 Rover 214. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 214. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 493 kg more than 1995 Rover 214. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 214, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 214. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 214.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1995 Rover 214 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Challenger | 214 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 421 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |