1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1995 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1995 Toyota Crown is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 405 kg more than 1995 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1995 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Crown |
Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |