1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 366 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Challenger | Challenger |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2730 mm |