1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1997 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1997 Mahindra Armada is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1997 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1997 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 505 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1997 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1997 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Dodge | Mahindra |
Model | Challenger | Armada |
Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4310 mm |