1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (233 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Kia |
Model | Challenger | Elan |
Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 233 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2270 mm |