1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 640 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |