1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1999 Audi S3
To start off, 1999 Audi S3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1999 Audi S3. (210 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 45 kg more than 1999 Audi S3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi S3. (270 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1999 Audi S3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Audi |
| Model | Challenger | S3 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6974 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 42 L |
