1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (233 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
Make | Dodge | Seat |
Model | Challenger | Cordoba |
Year Released | 1969 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2520 mm |