1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 237 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | Equator |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5210 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 352 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3260 mm |
