1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Ford TL-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 193 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (352 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.

Compare all specifications: