1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 288 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Challenger | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |
