1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 850 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Challenger | M250 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 421 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |