1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 342 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Challenger | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |