1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 664 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Challenger | Caserta |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 545 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 936 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
