1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2000 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2000 Toyota RAV4. (146 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota RAV4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 325 kg more than 2000 Toyota RAV4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota RAV4. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota RAV4.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 545 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |