1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2000 Vector RD 180 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2000 Vector RD 180. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | Dodge | Vector |
Model | Challenger | RD 180 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 545 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |