1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 274 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Ranger |
Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3010 mm |