1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Dodge | MG |
| Model | Challenger | X20 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
