1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 305 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer. (382 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Challenger | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 545 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |
