1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Dodge Neon

To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Neon.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Neon.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2002 Dodge Neon
Make Dodge Dodge
Model Challenger Neon
Year Released 1969 2002
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6974 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 351 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2650 mm