1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Ford Mondeo

To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Mondeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 210 kg more than 2002 Ford Mondeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Mondeo. (175 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Mondeo.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2002 Ford Mondeo
Make Dodge Ford
Model Challenger Mondeo
Year Released 1969 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7206 cc 1751 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 317 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 545 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3950 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2760 mm