1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Honda Inspire
To start off, 2002 Honda Inspire is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Inspire (252 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Inspire should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Inspire, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Inspire. (401 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Inspire.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Honda Inspire | |
Make | Dodge | Honda |
Model | Challenger | Inspire |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 421 Nm | 401 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 73 L |