1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Challenger | Integra |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4374 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1725 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
