1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Challenger | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5562 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 421 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |
