1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 643 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 480 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 568 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Dodge | Lotec |
Model | Challenger | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1150 mm |