1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 129 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra Bolero. (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Dodge | Mahindra |
Model | Challenger | Bolero |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1695 kg |