1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 96 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Challenger | F1 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 422 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |
