1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 643 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (422 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Dodge Challenger 2002 Toyota Tundra
Make Dodge Toyota
Model Challenger Tundra
Year Released 1969 2002
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6286 cc 4698 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 200 HP 245 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 422 Nm 427 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1566 kg 923 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5530 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 3270 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 70 L