1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2002 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2002 Westfield ZEI is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2002 Westfield ZEI. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2002 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 928 kg more than 2002 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2002 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Dodge | Westfield |
Model | Challenger | ZEI |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 672 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2340 mm |