1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 189 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Challenger | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 78 L |